EspañolIn this episode, Josh and Jeremy Worley tackle the tactical myth that using props like crutches in a hearing will help win a Social Security Disability case. Josh explains that while it is acceptable to use assistive devices that are legitimately prescribed and documented in your medical records, using them purely for show will severely damage your credibility. Administrative Law Judges review your medical evidence beforehand and will notice if a device has never been mentioned by a doctor, making theatrics a significant liability.
The core of a successful claim is credibility, not performance. Josh advises that the goal is to provide honest, consistent testimony that aligns with the medical record. Attempting to "put on a show" or exaggerate your symptoms can lead a judge to question the truthfulness of your entire case, often becoming the deciding factor in a denial.
Myth Verdict
Busted. Bringing crutches or other medical props to your hearing will not help you win your case unless they are legitimately prescribed and documented in your medical records. Using them for show can destroy your credibility and lead to a denial.
Key Insights
- Credibility is Paramount: A judge's belief in your testimony is crucial. Exaggeration or theatrics can undermine your entire case.
- No Theatrics Needed: You do not need to "put on a show" or be overly dramatic when describing your condition to the judge.
- Evidence Over Appearance: The judge relies on your medical records, not your appearance. A device not found in your records will raise serious questions.
- Consistency is Key: Your testimony, your medical records, and your presentation (like using a cane) must all be consistent.
- Honesty is the Best Policy: The most effective strategy is to be truthful and consistent about your limitations from your application through your hearing testimony.
